Review



anti pd 1 antibody  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress anti pd 1 antibody
    Anti Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 10 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pd 1 antibody/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 10 article reviews
    anti pd 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    MedChemExpress anti pd 1 antibody
    Anti Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pd 1 antibody/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti pd 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress anti mouse pd 1 antibodies
    Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the <t>anti-PD-1</t> group.
    Anti Mouse Pd 1 Antibodies, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse pd 1 antibodies/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse pd 1 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress anti mouse pd 1 antibody
    Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the <t>anti-PD-1</t> group.
    Anti Mouse Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse pd 1 antibody/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse pd 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    MedChemExpress αpd 1
    Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the <t>anti-PD-1</t> group.
    αpd 1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/αpd 1/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    αpd 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress anti mouse pd 1 antibody rmp1 14
    Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the <t>anti-PD-1</t> group.
    Anti Mouse Pd 1 Antibody Rmp1 14, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse pd 1 antibody rmp1 14/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse pd 1 antibody rmp1 14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress mouse anti ccr5
    Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the <t>anti-PD-1</t> group.
    Mouse Anti Ccr5, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti ccr5/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti ccr5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech mouse anti pd l1 antibody
    Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the <t>anti-PD-1</t> group.
    Mouse Anti Pd L1 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti pd l1 antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti pd l1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the anti-PD-1 group.

    Journal: Materials Today Bio

    Article Title: Metformin glycyrrhetinic acid binary injectable hydrogel for synergistic tumor immunotherapy via spatiotemporal microenvironment remodeling

    doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102749

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Systemic antitumor immune modulation and combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy mediated by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A ) Schematic illustration of the experimental timeline for treating B16F10 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice. ( B ) Representative images of excised tumors from each treatment group (n = 5). ( C ) Tumor growth curves across different treatments (n = 5). ( D ) Tumor inhibition rates following various treatments (n = 5). ( E ). Proposed mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H-induced immune activation and tumor suppression. ( F ) Spleens collected from each group (n = 5). ( G ) Spleen weights under different treatment conditions (n = 5). ( H, I ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD80 + CD86 + expression (H) and MHC-II (I) expression in splenic DCs (n = 5). ( J ) Flow cytometry assay of CD4 + and CD8 + expression (gated on CD3 + ) from splenocytes (n = 5). ( K ) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 + CD206 − and CD86 − CD206 + macrophages (gated on F4/80 + ) in tumors (n = 5). ( L, M ) Quantitative analysis of CD80 + CD86 DCs (L) and MHC-II DCs (M) in spleens (n = 5). ( N, O ) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + (N) and CD8 + (O) T-cell populations in spleen (n = 5). ( P ) Ratio of CD86 + CD206 − to CD86 − CD206 + (gated on F4/80 + ) tumor-associated macrophages (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test for pairwise comparisons and one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the anti-PD-1 group.

    Article Snippet: Anti-mouse PD-1 antibodies (Cat. No. S-5001) were obtained from MedChemExpress.

    Techniques: Inhibition, Activation Assay, Flow Cytometry, Expressing